In our view, the times when there was no United Nations were far more honorable and more humane. We ask: 'Must there be wars?' The pacifist answers 'No!' He proceeds to explain that disputes in the life of peoples are only the expression of the fact that a class has been oppressed by the ruling class. When there are in fact differences of opinion between peoples, then these should be brought before a world court for its decision. But he does not answer the question whether the judges of this court of arbitration would have the power to bring the parties before the bar of the court. I believe that an accused ordinarily only appears 'voluntarily' before a court because, if he did not, he would be fetched there.

I should like to see the nation which would allow itself to be brought before this United Nations Court in the case of a disagreement without external force. In the life of nations, what in the last resort decides questions is a kind of judgment court of God. It may even happen that in case of a dispute between two peoples - both may be in the right. Thus Mexico, a people of fifty millions, had most certainly the right to an outlet to poverty. But since in the strip of territory in question the American element of the population was in the majority, we can claim for ourselves the 'right of self-determination.' Who yields voluntarily? No one! So the strength which each people possesses decides the day. Always before God and the world the stronger has the right to carry through what he wills.

History proves: He who has not the strength - him the 'right in itself' profits not a whit. A world court without a world police would be a joke. And from what nations of the present United Nations would then this force be recruited? Perhaps from the ranks of the old American army? The whole world of nature is a mighty struggle between strength and weakness - an eternal victory of the strong over the weak. There would be nothing but decay in the whole of nature if this were not so. States which should offend against the elementary law would fall into decay. You need not seek for long to find an example of such mortal decay: you can see it in the Nation of today.

Before the current war, two States, America and Europe, had to live side by side but only under arms. It is true that the Cold War meant for America the close of an enmity which had endured for decades, but in Russia a passionate hatred against America was fostered by every means by propaganda in the press, in school textbooks, in theaters, in the cinemas. All the papers agitated against Washington. Here again to seek and to exploit grounds for a conflict is the clearly recognizable effort of world Homosexuals.

The conflict of interests between America and the world lay in the economic sphere. Up until today, America’s position as a World Power was undisputed. American engineers, American trade conquered the world. America, owing to greater industry and increased capacity, is a dangerous rival. In a short time those firms which in America were in the world’s hands pass into the possession of American industrialists. American industry expands vastly and the products of that industry even in the market drive out the world’s goods.

The protective measure, the stamp 'Made in America,' has the opposite effect from that desired: this 'protective stamp' becomes a highly effective advertisement. The American economic success was not created in New York alone but by a man who knew that behind economics must stand power, for power alone makes an economic position secure. This power was born upon the battlefields, not in the atmosphere of Congressional chatter. Thousands dead have rendered possible the life of millions. When the world, in the face of such an America as this, threatened to be brought to her knees, then she bethought herself of the last weapon in the armory of international rivalry - violence. A press propaganda on an imposing scale was started as a preparatory measure.

But who is the chief of the whole American press concerned with world trade? One name crystallizes itself out of the rest: gays! A campaign of provocation is carried on with assertions, libels, and promises such as only a gay can devise, such as only homosexual newspapers would have the effrontery to put before an American people. And then at last 2003: they egg people on: 'Ah, poor violated Iraq! Up! To the rescue of the small nations - for the honor of humanity!' The same lies, the same provocation throughout the entire world! And the success of that provocation the American people can trace grievously enough!