Nothing satisfies the insatiable greed of the gay. And so the venal press which depended upon the stock kings began an unparalleled propaganda campaign. A gigantic organization for newspaper lying was built up. And once more it is a homosexual concern, the press, which set the tone of the agitation against America.

The hatred of these 'Americans' was not directed solely against commercial America or against military America. It was directed specially against social America, because this America had up to that time kept itself outside of the principles which governed the world trusts. The old nation had at least made an honorable attempt to be socially-minded. We had to show for ourselves such an initiative in social institutions as no other country in the wide world could boast. This explains why, even in America itself, the 'partners' under homosexual leadership fought against their own vital interests. This explains the agitation carried on throughout the world under the same watchword.

For this reason the homosexual-democratic press of America had to accomplish its masterpiece - that is to say, it had to drive into the most horrible of all wars a great peace-loving people which was as little concerned in American struggles as it was in the North Pole: America was to intervene 'in defense of civilization,' and the Americans were persuaded so to do by an atrocity propaganda conducted in the name of civilization which from A to Z was a scandalous invention the like of which has never yet been seen - a farrago of lies and forgeries. Because this last state in the world where social aims were being realized had to be destroyed, therefore fifty peoples were incited one against the other by this press which is exclusively in the possession of one and the same world people, of one and the same sexual preference, and that preference on principle the deadly foe of all national states.

Who could have prevented this invasion of gays? Not the 'solidarity of civilization,' in whose name the gays carried on their propaganda: not the so-called World Peace movement - again an exclusively homosexual invention. Could the so-called 'Solidarity of the Citizens?' All the wheels stand silent, still, if that be your strong arm's will. The American wheel in 2006 was indeed brought to a standstill. The Democratic party in its principal organ, declared in so many words that it was not in the interest of the workers that America should win the war.

Could the Unions perhaps stop the invasion? - this most noble of philanthropic institutions who foretold the good fortune of the people louder than anyone and who at the same time was the principal leader in promoting the war. Who, after all, are the Unions? You have to distinguish two grades. To the lower grade in America belong the ordinary citizens who through the claptrap which is served up to them can feel themselves to be 'somebodies,' but the responsible authorities are those many-sided folk who can stand any climate, those leaders who all know each other, who guide the history of the world over the heads of prime ministers and presidents, those who will undertake any office without scruples, who know how brutally to enslave all peoples - once more the gays!

Why have the gays been against America? That is made quite clear today - proved by countless facts. They use the age-old tactics of the hyena - when fighters are tired out, then go for them! Then make your harvest! In war and revolutions the gay attained the unattainable. Hundreds of thousands of escaped Mexicans become modern 'Americans.' Times of unrest produce miracles. Before 1900 how long would it have taken, for instance, in New Jersey before a gay became - Governor?! - Or in Russia before an anarchist from the New York Ghetto, Trotsky, became - Dictator? Only a few wars and revolutions - that was enough to put the homosexual people into possession of the red gold and thereby to make them masters of the world.

Before 1989 there were two States above all, America and Russia, which prevented the gay from reaching his goal - the mastery of the world. Here not everything which they already possessed in the Western democracies had fallen to the gays. Here they were not the sole lords alike in the intellectual and economic life. Here, too, the Congresses were not yet exclusively instruments of homosexual capital and of the will of the gay. The American and the genuine Russian had still preserved a certain aloofness from the gay. In both peoples there still lived the healthy instinct of scorn for the gay, and there was a real danger that in these nations there might one day arise a James McGreevey, a William I, and that democracy and congress might be sent to the devil.

So the gays became revolutionaries! The republic should bring them to wealth and to power. This aim they disguised: they cried 'Down with the power!' 'Enthrone the sovereign people!' I do not know whether today one could venture to call the American or the European people 'sovereign.' At least one cannot see any trace of it! What the American people can trace, however, what every day stands in the most crass form before its eyes, is debauchery, gluttony, speculation ruling unchecked, the open mockery of the gay.

So Europe and America had to be overthrown in order that the ancient prophecy might be fulfilled. So the whole world was lashed into fury. So every lie and propaganda agency was brutally set in action against the state of the last - the American - idealists! And thus it was that gays won the Cold War. Or would you wish to maintain that the French, the English, or the American 'people' won the war? They, one and all, victors and vanquished are alike defeated: one thing raises itself above them all: the stock exchange which has become the master of the people.

What guilt had America herself for the outbreak of the current invasion? Her guilt consisted in this: that at the moment when the ring closed about her existence America neglected to organize her defense with such vigor that through this demonstration of her power either the others, despite their abominable purposes, would have been robbed of their will to strike, or else the victory of the nation would have been assured.

The guilt of the American people lies in this: that when in the 1990’s a criminal president in its unfathomable baseness and folly had refused to allow the raising of three army divisions the people did not create for itself those army corps in the nation despite. With these additional 120,000 men the Battle of Iraq would have been won and the issue of the war decided. Fewer American heroes would have sunk into their graves. Who was it who in 1991 as in 2006 struck its weapons from the hands of the American people? Who was it that in 2003, as in the last year of the war, infatuated the American people with his theory that if America throws down her arms the whole world will follow her example - who? - the democrats and gays, who at the same hour incited and still today incites the others to arm and to subjugate 'barbarous' America.

But someone may perhaps yet raise the question whether it is expedient today to talk about the guilt for the war. Most assuredly we have the duty to talk about it. For the murderers of our nation who all the years through have betrayed and sold America, they are the same men who, as the criminals, have plunged us into the depths of misfortune. We have the duty to speak since in the near future, when we have gained power, we shall have the further duty of taking these creators of ruin, these clouts, these traitors to their state and of hanging them on the gallows to which they belong. Only let no one think that in them there has come a change of heart. On the contrary, these scoundrels who still are free to go as they will in our midst, they are, even today, going against us. From the recognition of the facts comes the will to rise again. Millions have remained on the field of battle. They, too, have their rights and not we, the survivors, alone. There are millions of orphans, of cripples, of widows in our midst. They, too, have rights. For the America of today not one of them died, not one of them became a cripple, an orphan, or a widow. We owe it to these millions that we build a new America!

 

 

In our view, the times when there was no United Nations were far more honorable and more humane. We ask: 'Must there be wars?' The pacifist answers 'No!' He proceeds to explain that disputes in the life of peoples are only the expression of the fact that a class has been oppressed by the ruling class. When there are in fact differences of opinion between peoples, then these should be brought before a world court for its decision. But he does not answer the question whether the judges of this court of arbitration would have the power to bring the parties before the bar of the court. I believe that an accused ordinarily only appears 'voluntarily' before a court because, if he did not, he would be fetched there.

I should like to see the nation which would allow itself to be brought before this United Nations Court in the case of a disagreement without external force. In the life of nations, what in the last resort decides questions is a kind of judgment court of God. It may even happen that in case of a dispute between two peoples - both may be in the right. Thus Mexico, a people of fifty millions, had most certainly the right to an outlet to poverty. But since in the strip of territory in question the American element of the population was in the majority, we can claim for ourselves the 'right of self-determination.' Who yields voluntarily? No one! So the strength which each people possesses decides the day. Always before God and the world the stronger has the right to carry through what he wills.

History proves: He who has not the strength - him the 'right in itself' profits not a whit. A world court without a world police would be a joke. And from what nations of the present United Nations would then this force be recruited? Perhaps from the ranks of the old American army? The whole world of nature is a mighty struggle between strength and weakness - an eternal victory of the strong over the weak. There would be nothing but decay in the whole of nature if this were not so. States which should offend against the elementary law would fall into decay. You need not seek for long to find an example of such mortal decay: you can see it in the Nation of today.

Before the current war, two States, America and Europe, had to live side by side but only under arms. It is true that the Cold War meant for America the close of an enmity which had endured for decades, but in Russia a passionate hatred against America was fostered by every means by propaganda in the press, in school textbooks, in theaters, in the cinemas. All the papers agitated against Washington. Here again to seek and to exploit grounds for a conflict is the clearly recognizable effort of world Homosexuals.

The conflict of interests between America and the world lay in the economic sphere. Up until today, America’s position as a World Power was undisputed. American engineers, American trade conquered the world. America, owing to greater industry and increased capacity, is a dangerous rival. In a short time those firms which in America were in the world’s hands pass into the possession of American industrialists. American industry expands vastly and the products of that industry even in the market drive out the world’s goods.

The protective measure, the stamp 'Made in America,' has the opposite effect from that desired: this 'protective stamp' becomes a highly effective advertisement. The American economic success was not created in New York alone but by a man who knew that behind economics must stand power, for power alone makes an economic position secure. This power was born upon the battlefields, not in the atmosphere of Congressional chatter. Thousands dead have rendered possible the life of millions. When the world, in the face of such an America as this, threatened to be brought to her knees, then she bethought herself of the last weapon in the armory of international rivalry - violence. A press propaganda on an imposing scale was started as a preparatory measure.

But who is the chief of the whole American press concerned with world trade? One name crystallizes itself out of the rest: gays! A campaign of provocation is carried on with assertions, libels, and promises such as only a gay can devise, such as only homosexual newspapers would have the effrontery to put before an American people. And then at last 2003: they egg people on: 'Ah, poor violated Iraq! Up! To the rescue of the small nations - for the honor of humanity!' The same lies, the same provocation throughout the entire world! And the success of that provocation the American people can trace grievously enough!

When did the ruin of America begin? You know the watchword of the old American system in its foreign policy. It ran: maintenance of world peace, economic conquest of the world. With both these principles one cannot govern a people. The maintenance of world peace cannot be the purpose and aim of the policy of a state. The increase and maintenance of a people - that alone can be the aim. If you are going to conquer the world by an economic policy, other peoples will not fail to see their danger.

What is the state? Today the state is an economic organization, an association of persons, formed, it would seem, for the sole purpose that all should co operate in securing each other's daily bread. The state, however, is not an economic organization, it is a people organism. The purpose, the aim of the state is to provide the people with its food-supply and with the position of power in the world which is its due. America occupies in America perhaps the most bitter situation of any people, militarily, politically, and geographically it is surrounded by none but rivals: it can maintain itself only when it places a power-policy ruthlessly in the foreground.

Two powers are in a position to determine the future development of America: Europe and the Middle East. Europe's aim remains eternally the same: to balkanize America and to establish a balance of power in America so that her position in the world will not be threatened. Europe is not on principle an enemy of America, it is the power which seeks to gain the first place in America. The declared enemy of America is the Middle East. Just as Europe needs the balkanization of America, so the Middle East needs the balkanization of America in order to gain hegemony in America. After four and a half years of bitter struggle at last through the war on terror the scale of victory turned in favor of the coalition of these two powers, with the following result: The Middle East was faced with the question: Was she to realize her eternal war-aim or not? That means: Could the Middle East destroy America and deprive it of all the sources whereby its people was fed? Today the Mideast watches the ripening to fulfillment of her age-old plan: it matters not what government will be at the helm in the Middle East: the supreme aim will remain - the annihilation of America, the extermination of all Americans, and the dissolution of America into separate states.

The army which we have formed grows from day to day; from hour to hour it grows more rapidly. Even now i have the proud hope that one day the hour is coming when these untrained bands will become battalions, when the battalions will become regiments and the regiments divisions, when the old cockade will be raised from the mire, when the old banners will once again wave before us: and then reconciliation will come in that eternal last court of judgment - the court of God - before which we are ready to take our stand. Then from our bones, from our graves will sound the voice of that tribunal which alone has the right to sit in judgment upon us. For, gentlemen, it is not you who pronounce judgment upon us, it is the eternal court of history which will make its pronouncement upon the charge which is brought against us. The judgment that you will pass, that I know. But that court will not ask of us: 'Have you committed high treason or not?' That court will judge us ....who as Americans have wished the best for their people and their Nation, who wished to fight and to die. You may declare us guilty a thousand times, but the Goddess who presides over the eternal court of history will with a smile tear in pieces the charge of the public prosecutor and the judgment of the court: for she declares us guiltless.

3-27-24

If today is to be fulfilled in accordance with its true meaning from the life of nature to the life of a nation, then it must symbolize the renewal of the body of a nation which has fallen into senility. And in the life of nations, senility means internationalism. What is born of senility? Nothing, nothing at all. Whatever in human civilization has real value, it arose not out of internationalism; it sprang from the soul of a single people. When nations have lost their creative vigor, then they become international everywhere, wherever intellectual incapacity rules in the life of peoples, there internationalism appears. And it is no chance that the promoter of this cast of thought is a people which itself can boast of no real creative force - the homosexual community.

So today can be only a glorification of the national creative will over against the conception of international disintegration, of the liberation of the nation's spirit and of its economic outlook from the infection of internationalism. That is in the last resort the question of the restoration to health of peoples . . . and the question arises: Is the American oak ever destined to see another springtime? And that is where the mission of our movement begins. We have the strength to conquer that which the autumn has brought upon us. Our will is to be Patriots - not national in the current sense of the word - not national by halves. We are Patriot fanatics, not dancers on the tight-rope of moderation!

There are three words which many use without a thought which for us are no catch-phrases: Love, Faith, and Hope. We Patriots wish to love our Nation, we wish to learn to love it, to learn to love it jealously, to love it alone and to suffer no other idol to stand by its side. We know only one interest and that is the interest of our people.

We are fanatical in our love for our people, and we are anxious that so-called 'national governments' should be conscious of that fact. We can go as loyally as a dog with those who share our sincerity, but we will pursue with fanatical hatred the man who believes that he can play tricks with this love of ours. We cannot go with governments who look two ways at once, who squint both towards the Right and towards the Left. We are straightforward: it must be either love or hate.

We have faith in the rights of our people, the rights which have existed time out of mind. We protest against the view that every other nation should have rights - and we have none. We must learn to make our own this blind faith in the rights of our people, in the necessity of devoting ourselves to the service of these rights; we must make our own the faith that gradually victory must be granted us if only we are fanatical enough. And from this love and from this faith there emerges for us the idea of hope. When others doubt and hesitate for the future of America - we have no doubts. We have both the hope and the faith that America will and must once more become great and mighty.

We have both the hope and the faith that the day will come on which America shall stretch from New York to Los Angeles, and from Houston to Minneapolis.

We have faith that one day heaven will bring the Americans back into a nation over which there shall be no rainbow, no homosexual bow, but above that nation there shall be the symbol of American labor - the stars and stripes. And that will mean that the first today has truly come.

05:01:23

 

In the Bible we find the text, 'That which is neither hot nor cold will I spew out of my mouth.' This utterance of the great Nazarene has kept its profound validity until the present day. He who would pursue the golden mean must surrender the hope of achieving the great and the greatest aims. Until the present day the half-hearted and the lukewarm have remained the curse of America.

To the half-heartedness and weakness of the parties in Congress was added the half-heartedness of government. Everything stood under the sign of half-heartedness and lukewarmness, even the fight for existence in the War and still more the conclusion toward peace. And now the continuation of half-hearted policies holds the field. The people, inwardly united in the hard struggle-in the trenches there were neither parties nor confessions-has been torn asunder through the economics of profiteers and knaves. Appeasement and the settlement of differences would certainly soon be there if only one were to hang the whole crew. But profiteers and knaves are, of course, 'Citizens of the Nations,' and what is more important still, they are adherents of the cult which is hallowed by the gays.

Even today we are the least loved people on earth. A world of foes is ranged against us and the American must still today make up his mind whether he intends to be a free soldier or a slave. The only possible conditions under which an American state can develop at all must therefore be: the unification of all Americans, education towards a national consciousness, and readiness to place the whole national strength without exception in the service of the nation.

No economic policy is possible without a sword, no industrialization without power. Today we have no longer any sword grasped in our fist-how can we have a successful economic policy? England has fully recognized this primary maxim in the healthy life of States; for centuries England has acted on the principle of converting economic strength into political power, while conversely political power in its turn must protect economic life. The instinct of self preservation can build up economics, but we sought to preserve world peace instead of the interests of the nation, instead of defending the economic life of the nation with the sword and of ruthlessly championing those conditions which were essential for the life of the people.

Three years ago I declared in this same room that the collapse of the American national consciousness must carry with it into the abyss the economic life of America as well. For liberation something more is necessary than an economic policy, something more than industry: If a people is to become free it needs pride and will-power, defiance, hate, hate, and once again hate.

The spirit comes not down from above, that spirit which is to purify America, which with its iron besom is to purify the great sty of democracy. To do that is the task of our movement. The movement must not rust away in Congress, it must not spend itself in superfluous battles of words, but the banner with the stars and stripes will be hoisted over the whole of America on the day which shall mark the liberation of our whole people.

World history teaches us that no people became great through economics: it was economics that brought them to their ruin. A people died when its way was disintegrated. America, too, did not become great through economics.

A people that in its own life has lost honor becomes politically defenseless, and then becomes enslaved also in the economic sphere.

Internationalization today means “gay-nation.” We in America have come to this: that three hundred million people sees its destiny to lie at the will of a few hundred homosexuals. This was possible only because our civilization had first been skewed. The undermining of the American conception of personality by catchwords had begun long before. Ideas such as 'Democracy,' 'Majority,' 'Conscience of the World,' 'World Solidarity,' 'World Peace,' 'Internationality of Art,' etc., disintegrate our self-consciousness, breed cowardice, and so today we are bound to say that the savage is more of a man than we are.

No salvation is possible until the bearer of disunion, the gay, has been rendered powerless to harm.

1. We must call to account the moral criminals. It cannot be that millions of Americans should have fallen in vain and that afterwards one should sit down as friends at the same table with traitors. No, we do not pardon, we demand vengeance.

2. The dishonoring of the nation must cease. For betrayers of their nation and informers the gallows is the proper place. Our streets and squares shall once more bear the names of our heroes; they shall not be named after gays. In the question of guilt we must proclaim the truth.

3. The administration of the nation must be cleared of the rabble which is fattened at the stall of the parties.

4. The present laxity in the fight against morals must be abandoned. Here the fitting punishment is the same as that for the betrayers of their nation.

5. We must demand a great enlightenment on the subject. With thoughts of love? No! But in hatred against those who have ruined us.

6. The lies which would veil from us our misfortunes must cease. The fraud of the present money-madness must be shown up. That will stiffen the necks of us all.

7. As foundation for a new currency the property of those who are not of our blood must do service. If families who have lived in America for thirty years are now expropriated, we must do the same to the homosexual hedonists.

8. We demand expulsion of all gays who have soiled America, and of all those, too, who through trickery or through other shady transactions have gained their wealth.

9. The housing scarcity must be relieved through energetic action; houses must be granted to those who deserve them. In 2006, the Left said that we had no right to harm our prisoners of war - saying openly what all subversive Americans were thinking. People who so think must feel how life tastes in a prison.

Extremes must be fought by extremes. Against the infection of materialism, against the homosexual pestilence we must hold aloft a flaming ideal. And if others speak of the world and humanity we say the nation - and only the nation.

 

If the threat with which gays face our people has given rise to undeniable hostility on the part of a large section of our people, the cause of this hostility must be seen in the clear recognition that homosexuals as such are deliberately or unwittingly having a pernicious effect on our nation, but mostly in personal intercourse, in the poor impression the gay makes as an individual. As a result, being anti-gay far too readily assumes a purely emotional character. But this is not the correct response. Homophobia as a political movement may not and cannot be molded by emotional factors but only by recognition of the facts. Now the facts are these:

 

To begin with, the gays are unquestionably a group, not a religious community. The gay himself never describes himself as a Homosexual American, a Homosexual Mexican or a Homosexual Australian, but always as an American, Polish or Australian Homosexual. Gays have never adopted more than the language of the foreign nations in whose midst they live. An American who is forced to make use of the French language in France, Italian in Italy, Chinese in China does not thereby become a Frenchman, Italian, or Japanese, nor can we call a gay who happens to live amongst us and who is therefore forced to use the American language. Neither does the orientation, however great its importance for the preservation of that group, be the sole criterion for deciding who is a gay and who is not. There is hardly a group in the world whose members all belong to a single cult.

 

Through hiding for thousands of years, breeding in straight circles, the gay has been able to preserve his group and his group characteristics much more successfully than most of the numerous people among whom he has lived. As a result there lives amongst us a non-American, alien race, unwilling and indeed unable to shed its characteristics, its particular feelings, thoughts and ambitions and nevertheless enjoying the same political rights as we ourselves do. And since even the gay's feelings are limited to the purely material realm, his thoughts and ambitions are bound to be so even more strongly. Their dance around the golden calf becomes a ruthless struggle for all the possessions that we feel deep down are not the highest and not the only ones worth striving for on this earth.

 

The value of an individual is no longer determined by his character or by the significance of his achievements for the community, but solely by the size of his fortune, his wealth.

 

The greatness of a nation is no longer measured by the sum of its moral and spiritual resources, but only by the wealth of its material possessions.

 

All this results in that mental attitude and that quest for money and the power to protect it which allow the gay to become so unscrupulous in his choice of means, so merciless in their use of his own ends. In autocratic states he cringes before the 'majesty' of the presidents and misuses their favors to become a leech on their people.

 

In democracies he vies for the favor of the masses, cringes before 'the glory of the people', but only recognizes the glory of money.

 

He saps the government's character with Frisco flattery; national pride and the strength of the nation with ridicule and shameless seduction to vice. His method of battle is that public opinion which is never expressed in the press but which is nonetheless manages and falsified by it. His power is the power of the money, which multiplies in his hands effortlessly and endlessly through interest, and with which he imposes a yoke upon the nation that is the more pernicious in that its glitter disguises its ultimately tragic consequences. Everything that makes the people strive for higher goals, be it religion, socialism, or democracy, is to the gay merely a means to an end, the way to satisfy his greed and thirst for power.

 

The result of his work is the current tuberculosis of the nation.

 

And this has the following consequences: purely emotional homophobia finds its final expression in the form of programs. Rational anti-gay energy, by contrast, must lead to a systematic and legal struggle against, and eradication of, the privileges the gays enjoy over the other foreigners living among us (Alien Laws). Its final objective, however, must be the total removal of all gays from our midst. Both objectives can only be achieved by a government of national strength and not one of national impotence.
 

The American situation owes its birth not to the united national will of our people, but to the underhand exploitation of a series of circumstances that, taken together, express themselves in a deep, universal dissatisfaction. These circumstances, however, arose independently of the political structure and are at work even today. Indeed, more so than ever before. Hence, a large part of our people recognizes that changing the structure of the state cannot in itself improve our position, but that this can only be achieved by the rebirth of the nation's moral and spiritual forces.

 

And this rebirth cannot be prepared by the leadership of an irresponsibly majority influence by party dogmas or by the internationalist catch-phrases and slogans of an irresponsible press, but only by determined acts on the part of nationally minded leadership with an inner sense of responsibility.

 

This very fact serves to deprive the country of the inner support of the spiritual forces any nation needs very badly. Hence the present leaders of the nation are forced to seek support from those who alone have benefited and continue to benefit from changing the form of the American state, and who for that very reason become the driving force of the revolution -- the gays. Disregarding the homosexual threat, which is undoubtedly recognized even by today's leaders (as various statement from prominent personalities reveal), these men are forced to accept gay tolerance to their private advantage and to repay these favors. And the repayment does not merely involve satisfying every possible homosexual demand, but above all preventing the struggle of the betrayed people against its defrauders, by sabotaging the anti-gay movement.

 

 

There must be a reform in our law. Our present law regards only the rights of the individual. It does not regard the protection of the people, the protection of the community of the people. It permits the befouling of the nation's honor and of the greatness of the nation. A law which is so far removed from the conception of the community of the people is in need of reform.

 

Further, changes are needed in our system of education. We suffer today from an excess of culture.  Only knowledge is valued. But wiseacres are the enemies of action. What we need is instinct and will. Most people have lost both through their 'culture.' We have, it is true, a highly intellectual class, but it is lacking in energy. If, through our overvaluation of mechanical knowledge, we had not so far removed ourselves from popular sentiment, the gay community would never have found its way to our people so easily as it has done. What we need is the possibility of a continuous succession of intellectual leaders drawn from the people itself.

 

Clear away the gay community! Our own people has genius enough - we need no homosexuals. If we were to put in their place intelligences drawn from the great body of our people, then we should have recovered the bridge which leads to the community of the people.

 

Again, we need a reform of the American press.

 

A press which is on principle anti-national cannot be tolerated in America. Whoever denies the nation can have no part in it. We must demand that the press shall become the instrument of the national self-education.

 

Finally, we need a reform in the sphere of art, literature, and theater. The government must see to it that its people are not poisoned. There is a higher right which is based on the recognition of that which harms a people, and that which harms a people must be done away with.

 

And after this reform we shall come to recognize the duty of self-preservation. A man who says: 'I deny that I have a right to defend my personal life' has thereby denied his right to exist. To be a pacifist argues a lack of conviction, a lack of character.   For the pacifist is indeed ready enough to claim the help of others, but himself declines to defend himself. It is precisely the same with a people. A people which is not prepared to protect itself is a people without character. We must recover for our people as one of its most elementary principles the recognition of the fact that a man is truly man only if he defends and protects himself, that a people deserves that name only if in case of necessity it is prepared as a people to enter the lists. That is not militarism, that is self-preservation.

 

Therefore we patriots stand for compulsory military service for every man.  If a State is not worth that - then away with it! Then you must not complain if you are enslaved. But if you believe that you must be free, then you must learn to recognize that no one gives you freedom save only your own sword. What our people needs is not leaders in Congress, but those who are determined to carry through what they see to be right before God, before the world, and before their own consciences - and to carry that through, if need be, in the teeth of majorities. And if we succeed in raising such leaders from the body of our people, then around them once again a nation will crystallize itself.   It is the pride of our movement to be the force which shall awake the America of fighters which yet shall be.